PM3  D2P5 / 4 - issue 00 Introduction

This moral project develops the deduction of D2P5 / 4 of DECOD.

OBJECTIVE: The precise objective is to accurately present in a public manner the fundamental lack of the social system, which determines through a series of negative effects summarized, the irreversible decrease of the quality of life of the children, especially those socially unattended and belonging to families of no public visibility. The fundamental lack is the electoral system which provides for voters only the positive corrective action of voting every four years, but does not provide for that electorate the corrective expression of the negative vote, if the elected not abide by the election agreement. The consequences of the decline in children’s lives lead to future dependency, suffering, disease and premature death and not the happiness they have a natural right to.

This lack is the cause to all negative effects on human society and there is no deeper cause, which means that any other claim of any nature from any segment of the people, even accomplished is insignificant compared to the infinity of simultaneous adverse effects caused by the lack mentioned.

Since the balance of power in the “horizontal" dimension between area B (State) and area A (population not included in the functions or official structures of the state) is 100% in favor of B vs. 0% in favor of A, the state in which the population from area A lives in is a state of quasi-slavery to the decision-makers of area B. The associative conceptual link between real events of the social structure and representative "democracy" is of the same nature as the link between actual events and the concept of "Arbeit macht frei" used in the concentration camps of the Second World War, because in both cases words are used to give false hope to human beings. There is no difference in terms of perpetuating this unequal power relationship between any historically known social systems, including Capitalism, the Communist regime and the Post-Communist regime it succeeded.

This moral project presents the solution to the fundamental conflict, regarding the legitimacy of the party entitled to lead. When asking "Who is entitled to lead, man or system? », for which the conclusion that man with an individual value either dies or accepts the domestication of the man who is backed by the System that triumphs, has been promoted since Antiquity . The answer is that "none of the parties are more entitled to lead than the other, but between them there must be a dynamic state of balance.” The answer is based on the fact that over time, during these years, for the first time since the beginning of plant cultivation in the Neolithic Era, man has reached the technical capability to force a balance of power relation between the individual and the System.

After 50 election cycles, it is clear that the "changes" did not change the old orders enough, that they were made by the wrong person for the wrong target. Common people who lived before were deceived, those living now are deceived, and if things remain unchanged, those who will live will also be deceived. We recognize, however, that this occurred by one of the smartest scams, perfect in its own way since so many generations have been brought to helplessness and eliminated without even understanding.


The permanent vote as a concept presupposes the existence of both the positive vote and negative vote in so that one can be assured that a balanced power relationship between the administrator who is the state and nation exists. Not because the state would be harmful since its institutions appeared legal, although as a result of a cascade of revolutions of the last 300 years, but because groups of individuals, who occupied key positions in state institutions that can hijack the functional institutions of this impersonal construction, using it in their own interest at the expense of the legitimate interest of the people.

We mention that at this stage the project is presented in ordinary language and that it contains no technical data (such as for example those related to cost, comparison with other electoral systems, correlation with electronic voting arrangements made until the present day) or legal data (we are referring to the specific texts of regulatory documents that describe the electoral system based on the permanent vote).

P.S. In order to avoid confusion, we draw attention to the fact that this is just an opinion from a non-governmental body, stated according to law as apolitical, meaning that is has no intention to acquire and maintain any political power. The approach of such a concept is not in itself anything spectacular in comparison with the daily themes of countless television channels, which are also declared apolitical. We stress that although we consider the subject it vital to society, no one and nothing can force us to have perfect answers to all the questions that should arise from the enunciation of this issue, even betting on the fact that we do or do not have them, the subject would lose credibility, because, as compared to several hundred years ago when it initially came to voting, man went into space, and mankind entered the internet age and people do not fall into ecstasy so easily, as they learned to read. We reserve the right to make changes in theme with absolutely no prior public announcement. Also, we stress that we have not intended to create any literary works, which is why we will not respond in any way to any comments about spelling and punctuation, simply because we care about the transfer of the essential concept and not the literary form. We state that we are no better or worse than our fellow human beings and we have voluntarily invested the time into this project while motivated by altruism, as we believe that the un-handicapped children of ordinary people deserve attention. And finally, we mention that we categorically differentiate ourselves in our approach from all people (regardless of ethnicity) or organizations that use the image of children to have financial and material gains.

PM3 D2P5/4 - tema 27. Mesaj catre Presedintia Romaniei

PM3 D2P5/4 - issue 26. Can anyone guarantee freedom?

Nobody can guarantee freedom, as no one can guarantee neither justice, nor success, nor happiness, nor health etc.

For this reason we looked to see the parts and complete them with natural rules to ensure continuous balance between the parties.

PM3 D2P5/4 - issue 01.3 Significance of actions: The second moment absent from the current eletoral system - the correction


Correction is the action of removing of a detected nonconformity.

The electoral system was designed as a system in an absolutely fascinating, highly intelligent way, but in a profoundly perverse way in regards to the electorate, because it does not allow for a balance between the parties by making corrections. It is extremely difficult to understand. The charade was debunked and it is only a matter of time before this "sphinx" will fall, and we are not referring in particular to the capitalist regime or the "communist" or "post-communist" regimes, but to the model of the social structure system that has no balance of power between the parties, which was found in all these regimes.

To understand the significance of the statement, it is sufficient to compare this situation to that of a company in which corrections would never be applied to stop the delivery of non-conforming products compared to market demands, but it would always try to just eliminate the momentary causes of nonconformity. Obviously such a company could not avoid collapse and bankruptcy.

Given the idea D21P7 / 1 of the DECODE, actually a form of state organization goes bankrupt / erodes away in the same logically comparable time duration with the life of a company in the economic environment, if it works without balance among the integral parts of the social structure (in Romania, capitalism has had a lifespan of 81 years, "communism" of 42 years; "post-communist democracy" after December 1989 already went through 22 years of existence of such an adulterated system with no balance between the social fabric and already the signs of its end are visible and logically, it is already a certainty that a new change of front will be attempted while maintaining the common scam of all forms of organization mentioned namely, population A’s  lack of constitutional right to sanction the elected official through the negative vote of the correctional type for abuse by which he violated the electoral agreement).

There is still a significant difference between the consequences of bankruptcy for companies and the consequences of bankruptcy of a form of state organization.

As a matter of fact, all legislation concerning the restitution of assets acquired ​​under the organization of the social system replaced by one that just expired is partially fair. This is because there being a high probability that many of those fortunes have been made exactly on account of the same lack we have mentioned in this moral project, the fortunes of those who profited from the unjust power ratio with population A, and those who have accumulated wealth and resources without benefiting from the unjust power ratio with population A, will be equally returned. This is unfair to the victims of the former, because it perpetuates injustice even beyond their death, and to those who have accumulated resources without use of unjust power ratios with population A.

We believe that the insurance of a nonviolent form is preferred to balance out the parts of the social system, by completing the electoral system with a corrective measure rather than bloodshed and chaos in society, because the change of "lords / kings" can only be the joy of the mad.


PM3 D2P5/4 - theme 1.2 Significance of actions: moment 2 provided by the current electoral system - corrective action


Actiunea corectiva este actiunea de eliminare a cauzei unor neconformitati sau a altei situatii nedorite.

Exista o distinctie intre corectie si actiunea corectiva.

PM3 D2P5/4 - issue 24. What chance can a technocrat government have?


It is impossible for a technocrat government to attain its objectives because it would be continuously conditioned by parliamentary support from the elected representatives of the party or the coalition in power. The proof lies in the fact that even non-technocratic governments are conditioned by parliamentary support from the elected officials in its own party or coalition in power.









PM3 D2P5/4 - issue 25. Does compulsory voting make sense?


We think that it does not make sense as long as the electoral system only allows for positive voting, but does not allow for negative voting of the elected officials who violated the electoral agreement and did not comply with the electoral program, because it would create another opportunity to terrorize a population which in fact cannot react toward abuse.

Even more so we believe that it does not make sense if the current electoral system would complement the negative vote, as it would be a contradiction to the very meaning of the concept "freedom".



PM3 D2P5/4 - issue 23. What are the chances of all public institutions and companies to not to be politicized?


With the current representative political system based on only the positive vote, it is impossible for state institutions to not be politicized.

In the system based on the permanent vote, the person becomes less important than the program for which he was elected. It is understandable that one cannot implement a program without trustworthy people, but the essential difference is that the results would be public, permitting reaction to the electorate through voting.



Scopul infiintarii asociatiei cu caracter apolitic Societatea pentru Proiecte Morale Structurate Calitativ este promovarea unor produse morale structurate calitativ, cu scopul de a creste calitatea vietii copiilor, in special a celor neasistati social si proveniti din familii fara vizibilitate publica.